data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cfed/8cfed6276184fd77fa0f801f3c9fd3debc5db908" alt=""
AD was Patricia Hwang.
Interesting point from the article
"In an effort to scuttle the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty in Congress, the Conservative Caucus took out a newspaper advertisement likening Reagan's position to British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's dealings with Hitler."
Apparently Reagan was a appeaser too for talking to the evil empire.
I wanted it to be somewhat general but I did use scrap of Ahmadinejad and Obama as reference
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e913/3e913b3aab89e4cc000a2294ebe083453d9c96b3" alt=""
So I usually try to give a ton of different ideas to cover the myriad of directions the article might end up taking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ea7c/1ea7c023a1eec47606d381efad524b660a3ff750" alt=""
here's the piece that ran the week or 2 before for the Samantha Powers column, this time it was on a commencement speech she gave. Talking about how young (an old) people can customize their media so much, that one can never get surprised and led off in a different direction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c16c2/c16c2e5842c0b43927b2fdbf267319774561d8c1" alt=""
It's funny whenever I go back and look at old sets of roughs after a some time being away from them, it's so obvious which one is the best and it was 9 times out of 10 it's the one the AD picked. That's why it's nice to have a good set of second eyes not so enmeshed in the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment